Skip to main content

Negligence in consultation notes and treatment?

Several of my colleagues will dictate consultation notes in which they state they don't have the complete history. For example: "Mrs. Smith was hospitalized last month with chest pain and shortness of breath. However, the details of that hospitalization are unclear to me." From a legal standpoint, is this something that should be avoided or is it acceptable? Thanks.

 
Share this with your friends

Medical malpractice

Interesting, and somewhat disturbing, question.  Hopefully an attorney with some experience in actually trying or defending medical malpractice claims will chime in on this one, but to my untrained eye it sounds like an issue.  The note, in and of itself, is not too troubling, because it is a statement of fact.  However, if the doctor does not follow up on the issue and obtain the information she needs to properly evaluate or treat the patient, then I can see potential problems. As you may know, Medical negligence (commonly referred to as "medical malpractice") can be described as a failure of a responsible or treating health care provider to exercise that degree of skill and care that is reasonably expected of him under a given set of circumstances.  It is hard to see how a doctor can treat a patient properly--and meet that duty of care--without first obtaining all relevant and reasonably available information about the patient.  Thanks for the question.

Medical Malpractice

The question probably boils down to whether or not such practice is within (or outside of) the generally accepted "duty of care" owed by reasonably prudent physicians in the same (or similar) areas of practice, degree of training/experience, geographic locale, etc.

For example, if other patient records are known to exist and relatively easy to procure (e.g., as kept by another department within the same facility), probably there would be a duty to obtain/consider them as relevant to the current condition. Failure to do so could thus be deemed a breach of the generally accepted duty of care. If, on the other hand, patient records might only potentially exist at, say, an unrelated facility very far away - and there is no routine procedure for sharing patient records with that facility - failing to obtain them could well be deemed reasonable and within the duty of care. (In the latter example, it is still possible, however, that the facility’s overarching failure to establish procedures for obtaining such records could be deemed negligent in/of itself, especially if record-sharing procedures are usually in place at similar local facilities.) Cases between these two examples would turn on their specific facts as measured against the usual duty of care.

Looking into how physicians at your facility and those surrounding it handle this situation might be a good idea. I also recommend keeping a close eye on the development of electronic patient records, which would presumably be more easily obtainable, and could thus impose a duty to obtain/review them, especially if your peers generally do.

Talk to a Medical Malpractice Lawyer Today
Most offer FREE Consultations
Connect with The Forum
facebook google twitter linkedin